When a development application (DA) is proposed, many community members hope that their objections will lead to the application being outright refused. While it's important to express concerns, it’s crucial to understand the realistic impact of public submissions. Rather than expecting councils to reject a proposal entirely, it's more effective to focus on how submissions can shape the development to better fit the community's needs.
1. Realistic Expectations: Development Approval
It is essential for community members to recognize that some form of development is likely to be approved. In most cases, councils approve development applications that comply with local planning regulations. Public submissions are not typically used to stop the development entirely but to influence its design and implementation. Understanding this reality helps in framing submissions that focus on improving rather than halting the proposed development.
2. Shaping, Not Stopping
Public submissions are most valuable when they offer constructive feedback that can be used to improve the proposed development. Instead of simply demanding that a proposal be rejected, focus on how it can be adjusted to minimize negative impacts. Councils are more likely to consider and act on suggestions that offer practical solutions.
For example, rather than submitting a public objection that states, "The development will increase overshadowing onto my private open space and should therefore be refused," it is more effective to provide a specific design solution. A submission like, "The proposal should be further offset from the boundary to mitigate overshadowing impacts on neighbouring properties," offers a concrete suggestion that the council can evaluate and potentially incorporate into the development plans.
3. Engaging with Council's Planning Process
Councils are required to consider all public submissions, and thoughtful, well-reasoned feedback can influence the decision-making process. Engage with the planning process by referencing local planning instruments, such as the Local Environmental Plan (LEP) and Development Control Plan (DCP), and aligning your suggestions with these guidelines. This makes your submission more credible and relevant.
Conclusion
Understanding the influence of public submissions can help manage expectations and improve the effectiveness of community feedback. By focusing on practical solutions and constructive feedback, you can contribute to a more balanced development outcome that benefits both the community and the developer.
Kommentare